The bishop’s vote in Tynwald provides a spiritual voice in public life, allowing the feelings of those in the minority to be heard and recorded in the democratic process.

In a recent interview, the retiring Bishop of Sodor and Man, Peter Eagles, emphasized the importance of the bishop’s right to vote in Tynwald, the parliament of the Isle of Man. According to Bishop Eagles, while elected politicians may find it difficult to vote against strong public opinion, the bishop’s position allows for the representation of minority views in the democratic process.

During his tenure, there have been two attempts to remove the bishop’s vote. However, Bishop Eagles argued that the bishop’s ability to say no, even when everyone else is saying yes, is crucial. He noted that spiritual and political interests often run parallel but can diverge at times, making the bishop’s vote all the more significant.

The potential controversy surrounding the bishop’s vote should not overshadow its importance. Without this right, the bishop’s role would be reduced to a mere chaplaincy, rather than a spiritual voice in public life. Bishop Eagles firmly believes that maintaining the bishop’s presence and influence in the democratic process is essential.

Looking ahead, Bishop Eagles mentioned that his successor will not be in place for several months, but he assured that the diocese is secure. He also emphasized the significance of the title of the diocese of Sodor and Man, as it represents a unique history and demonstrates the distinctness of the church on the Isle of Man.

In conclusion, Bishop Eagles expressed his deep love for the island and its people, reflecting on his time serving as the Bishop of Sodor and Man. The bishop’s vote in Tynwald plays a vital role in providing a spiritual voice in public life and ensuring the representation of minority views in the democratic process.